Legal Opinion

Seeley v. Cornell

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 20, 1934No. 7468PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a bill in equity on the sole ground that indispensable parties had been omitted whoso joinder and proper alignment as plaintiffs would defeat jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship.

The bill is lengthy and diffuse, occupying 34 pages of the printed record, and therefore the case appears to bo complicated. However, stripped of surplusage and redundancy, the material allegations of the bill may be somewhat briefly stated and the canse of action is clear. The plaintiffs are Viola Seeley, a feme sole, and Ida May Ramsey,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Payne v. HookSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Horn v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Lockhart v. LeedsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Calcote v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  2. Hudson v. NewellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  3. Helen McLanahan Stevens v. Chauncey C. LoomisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
  4. Lige Estes v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  5. Young v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API