Legal Opinion
Milburn v. West
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 15, 1994No. Civ. A. 90-1947-LFO, 91-2216-LFO, 92-0207-LFO, and 90-2443-LFOPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
OBERDORFER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought these consolidated actions under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. An initial trial before an advisory jury ended in a mistrial in February, 1993. A seven-day bench trial took place between January 25, 1994 and February 4, 1994. Plaintiff Milburn, in No. 90-1947, and plaintiff Walker both allege disparate treatment in connection with their nonselection for the position of general foreman of the utility, repair, and installation section of the maintenance branch of the Washington Aqueduct Division of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mack Davis v. Town of Lake Park, Florida, a Florida Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Freedman v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Childers v. SlaterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Weigert v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Hunter v. Ark Restaurants Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.