Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Sharon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 24, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 14, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed. The record establishes that, during the period in issue, claimant was the sole shareholder and president of a catering business. In furtherance of the business venture,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of JohnstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of KarpienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of LuongoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of RhodeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Claim of RestivoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re Claim of SwanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of KansuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of SpinningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of ZegelboneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005