Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Karpien
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 12, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
While collecting unemployment insurance benefits, claimant, a massage therapist, engaged in various activities to establish her own business, e.g., purchasing a massage chair and supplies, paying business-related laundry and telephone expenses and designing advertising flyers. During this period, she reported gross business income and business-related expenses on her income tax returns, while continuing to represent to the local unemployment insurance office that she was unemployed. Following a hearing, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found claimant ineligible to receive benefits…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of SchenkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of DonaghyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of SulyokAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Claim of PetrilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of KansuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of SharonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of CorcoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of ButtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.