Legal Opinion
Gray v. Mann
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 15, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions
This case was decided by Division A. Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Per curiam
— Following a general verdict for the defendant, a judgment was entered for costs only. Such judgment will not support a writ of error. Hall v. Patterson, 45 Fla. 353, 33 South. Rep. 982; Haynes v. Bramlett, 46 Fla. 348, 35 South. Rep. 3; Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. Jackson County Mill Company, 46 Fla. 236, 35 South. Rep. 877; Cobb v. County of Santa Rosa, 47 Fla. 135, 36 South. Rep. — . Writ dismissed.
Taylor, C. J., and Hocker and Cockrell, JJ., concur.
Carter, P. J., and Shackleford and Whitfield, JJ., concur in the opinion.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Haynes v. BramlettSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
- Cobb v. County of Santa RosaSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
- Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. Jackson County Mill Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1903
3Cited by5 opinions
- Caufield v. CanteleSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Craft v. ClarembeauxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Dexter v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of Florida · 1906
- In re Carol Florida Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- McGeachy v. BushSupreme Court of Florida · 1908