Cobb v. County of Santa Rosa
Supreme Court of Florida
This case was decided by the court En Banc. Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Per curiam
— Upon the trial of an action for trespass the jury found for the defendant, whereupon the following judgment alone was entered: “It is ordered by the court *136that the defendant do have and recover of and from the plaintiff its costs expended in and about their suit.”
Such a judgment will not support a writ of error. Hall v. Paterson, 45 Fla. 353, 33 South. Rep. 982; Haynes v. Bramlett, 46 Fla. 348, 35 South. Rep. 3; Birmingham Trust & Sav. Co. v. Jackson County Mill Company, 46 Fla. 236, 35 South. Rep. —.
Writ of error dismissed.
All-concur, except Taylor, C. J., absent on account of sickness.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hall v. PattersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
- Haynes v. BramlettSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
- Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. Jackson County Mill Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1903
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dexter v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of Florida · 1906
- Milteer v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1913
- Gray v. MannSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
- Young v. LassiterSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- In re Carol Florida Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.