Legal Opinion
McNulty v. Federal Housing Finance Agency
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 19, 2013No. Civil Action No. 3:12-1822PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MALACHY E. MANNION,1 District Judge.
Pending before the court is the defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Doc. No. 29). Based upon the court’s review of the record, the defendants’ motion to dismiss will be granted and the plaintiffs request for class certification will be dismissed as moot.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
By way of relevant background, on September 11, 2012, the plaintiff filed the instant proposed class action complaint on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, including the 67…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wellmark, Inc. D/B/A Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Iowa, an Iowa Corporation, and Wellmark Health Plan of Iowa, Inc., an Iowa Corporation v. Iowa District Court for Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Amended April 27, 2017 Wellmark, Inc. D/B/A Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Iowa, an Iowa Corporation, and Wellmark Health Plan of Iowa, Inc., an Iowa Corporation v. Iowa District Court for Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Commissioners v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013