Sullivan v. Hall
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Clare. (Hart, J., Proceedings under log-lien law of 1887. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This action was brought by attachment -in justice’s court under Act No. 229, Laws of 1887, to enforce a lien upon certain logs of the defendant. On the trial plaintiff had judgment for $16 and costs of suit, and for a lien upon the logs. The cause was removed by certiorari to the circuit court for Clare county, where the judgment was affirmed. The cause comes to this Court by writ of error.
The errors complained of are set forth in the affidavit for the writ of certiorari to the justice,’ and are:
1. That the notice of the lien was not properly sworn to as required by the act.
*10Because no…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Craddock v. DwightMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Bean v. AyersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1878
3Cited by9 opinions
- Coleman v. GurwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Peisker v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
- Grafton Hotel Co. v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1915
- State v. HillikerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1953
- Wise v. YunkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.