Legal Opinion
Craig v. Heil
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 28, 1946No. 384PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
This was a suit for possession of rooming house property, based on the owner’s claim that he required the premises for his personal use and occupancy as a dwelling, as authorized by the District of Columbia Emergency Rent Act.1 Trial was by jury and resulted in verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
*872At the trial defendant challenged the legality of the service of the notice to quit .upon which the suit was predicated. It developed that defendant did not live in the house in question but in nearby Virginia. The landlord made several unsuccessful attempts to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wise v. HerzogCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- H. L. Rust Co. v. DruryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
- Hardebeck v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920
- Morris v. BreakerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
3Cited by15 opinions
- Becker v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Moody v. Winchester Management Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Jones v. Brawner Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Barr v. Rhea Radin Real Estate, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
- Parker v. Frank Emmet Real EstateDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.