Legal Opinion

Morris v. Breaker

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 1944No. 200PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Associate Judge.

This is a landlord-tenant dispute in which judgment for possession was entered in favor of plaintiff. The appeal was not taken from the judgment itself but from orders overruling two motions filed more than three months after judgment. One motion was to quash the writ of restitution and the other sought an indefinite stay of execution.

At the trial, which was held December 8, 1943, plaintiff testified that he had bought the property involved in good faith and was seeking possession for his own personal use as a dwelling. See District of Columbia Emergency Rent Act, Code…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. District Hauling & Construction Co. v. ArgerakisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Meyer v. Capital Transit Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Shay v. Randall H. Hagner & Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. Brawner Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Zindler v. BuchanonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Craig v. HeilDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Collins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. Atchison & Keller, Inc. v. TaylorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API