Legal Opinion

Nieman v. Plough Chemical Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1927No. 4784PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.

This controversy concerns the rights of the respective parties to the use of the trade-mark or trade-name “Black and White,” as severally used by them.

On February 18, Í921, appellant applied for registration of a trade-mark “Black and White” for printed books and pamphlets in series (the first stated use thereof being February 1, 1921), and certificate of registration No. 148,495 was granted her November 15, 1921. On August 25 of that year appellee applied for registration of an alleged trade-mark “Black and White” for books, later amended to read “Black and White for…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Saxlehner v. Eisner & Mendelson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. A. J. Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. Philco Corporation v. F. & B. MFG. CO.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  3. Dowling v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  4. Revlon, Inc. v. Regal Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1961
  5. Ralston Purina Co. v. Saniwax Paper Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API