Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Hubbell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1917No. Docket No. 12PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Kent; Perkins, J. Bill by Raymond H. Wilcox and others against George Hubbell, administrator of the estate of William Wilcox, deceased, and the Michigan Trust Company to enforce the performance of a trust agreement and for an accounting. From a decree for plaintiffs, defendant Hubbell appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

William Wilcox, 83 years of age, and a bachelor, of Honeoye Falls, Monroe county, N. Y., a small village about 16 miles from Rochester, died December 22, 1912, at Honeoye Falls, intestate. His sister, Lorinda Kendall, George Hubbell, son of a deceased gister, Susan Riehards, a daughter of another deceased sister, Raymond H., Sanford P., Louise M., Robert C., and Marion Wilcox, of Grand Rapids, Mich., children of Frederick P. Wilcox, a nephew of the deceased, survived him. Robert C. and Marion Wilcox are infants, represented by their mother as next friend. On the 30th day of October, 1912,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Van Cott v. . PrenticeNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Robb v. . Washington Jefferson CollegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Kelley v. SnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  4. Brown v. Mercantile Trust & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  5. Lewis v. CurnuttSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. National Shawmut Bank v. JoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Goodrich v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Cramer v. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  4. Coston v. Portland Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API