Legal Opinion · Dissent

Coston v. Portland Trust Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Dissent

This entire matter is before us again upon a petition for a rehearing presented by the appellants. Accompanying this petition and appellant's brief is another brief, very thorough in nature, filed by counsel for the Trust Companies' Association of Oregon.

It may be well at the outset to state the facts out of which this piece of litigation arose. In May of 1924, Thomas L. Garland and Netta A. Garland were husband and wife. At that time the title to at least four pieces of real property in the city of Portland was vested in the name of the wife. The record does not reveal the value of three of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Dolan's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Robb v. . Washington Jefferson CollegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Lines v. Lines, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1891
  5. Davis v. NeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coston v. Portland Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API