Legal Opinion
DeMasi v. Benefico
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 13, 2008No. 07 Civ. 8049(WCC)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CONNER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff, Joseph DeMasi, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that defendants violated his due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution when they terminated his benefits under N.Y. Gen. Mun. Law § 207-c. Defendants, Joseph Benéfico (“Benéfico”), Richard Sling-erland (“Slingerland”) and the Village of Pelham, New York, (collectively “defendants”), move to dismiss plaintiffs claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) on the grounds that plaintiffs benefits were lawfully terminated and his due…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Missere v. GrossDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Adams v. New York State Education DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Walter v. Queens Coll.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- 33 Seminary LLC v. City of BinghamtonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2012
- Alexander Bakal, David Visher, Sandra Visher and ESM Fund I, L.P., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. U.S. Bank National AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.