Legal Opinion

State v. Aubut

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 14, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POMEROY, Justice.

After conviction of the crime of uttering a forged instrument (17 M.R.S.A. 1501), the defendant has appealed. Several points of appeal are urged:

1. The Court erred in refusing to disqualify itself as being prejudiced towards the appellant by making his bail, pending trial in an excessive and oppressive amount, to wit, from $1,000 in District Court to $10,000 at arraignment, the Court well knowing of defendant’s lack of assets.

A careful review of the record reveals these facts: On September 17, 1968, the defendant was in Court with his privately-retained attorney. Upon…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. WarnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  4. Patterson v. RossignolSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
  5. State v. MerrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PierceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  2. State v. MurphySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  3. In Re Michael M.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  4. State v. JacquesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  5. State v. DeMatteoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API