Legal Opinion

State v. DeMatteo

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 31, 1973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POMEROY, Justice.

This appeal results from a judgment on a verdict of guilty returned by a jury after a trial in which the appellant was charged with the crime of larceny of $6,900. (17 M.R.S.A. § 2101.) Although many points of appeal were originally assigned, an amendment to the points of appeal limited the issues.

Before us now for consideration are but three points:

1. That the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction for the alleged offense.

2. That the jury instructions, as a matter of law, were confusing as to the law applicable to the extent to deprive the Defendant of a fair trial.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BoisvertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  2. State v. CoombsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1868
  3. State v. AubutSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  2. State v. BrasslettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  3. State v. BrasslettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API