Legal Opinion

Wiesenthal v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 5, 1952PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue is whether in a deed of real property, otherwise absolute on its face, a covenant that the grantees will not sell, transfer or lease any part thereof for a period of two years followed by a statement that ‘ ‘ This restriction against the sale, transfer and leasing may be waived by the grantors ” on payment by the grantees of $1,000 — is an illegal restraint upon alienation and void.

Plaintiffs, sellers, delivered the deed on June 9, 1950, to defendants, buyers, for a consideration stated therein of $4,004; in October, 1950, the buyers conveyed the same realty to another ; in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. De Peyster v. . MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  2. Continental Insurance v. New York & Harlem RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of WatonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954
  2. LaFond v. RumlerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Pomerantz v. Clearview Gardens First Through Sixth Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Arzee Supply Corp. v. SilvermanNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Edib v. EdibAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API