Legal Opinion

Doll v. Flintkote Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 7, 1956No. 42461PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Justice.

Emile M. Doll, the owner of certain property fronting on Poland Avenue in the - City of New Orleans, brought this *243suit against The Fiintkote Co. and the named municipality to obtain a declaratory judgment decreeing to be null and void an exchange of property made by and between the defendants, as well as Municipal Ordinance No. 18,706 C.C.S. which purported to authorize the exchange. (In the transaction the city conveyed to the company that stretch of Poland Avenue running alongside a square of ground adjacent to the one in which plaintiff’s property is located.)

In the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. CalamariSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. State ex rel. Cotonio v. Judge Criminal District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. City of New Orleans v. MangiarisinaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  4. State Ex Rel. Hourguettes v. City of GretnaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  5. Valenti v. Oster Bros. Carriage & Wagon Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Branton v. ParkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Mix v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. State ex rel. Broussard v. GautheLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Bagnoni v. KlemmCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API