Legal Opinion

City of New Orleans v. Mangiarisina

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 24, 1916No. 21879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Second. Recorder’s Court of New Orleans; Ben P. Tiller, Recorder. Salvador Mangiarisina was convicted of violating an ordinance of the city of New Orleans, and appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

PROVOSTY,' J.

The accused was prosecuted before the Second recorder’s court for violation of the following ordinance:

An Ordinance Defining Rat-Proofing of All Buildings.

An ordinance to better protect the public health, and particularly to prevent the introduction and spread of bubonic plague, by providing for the rat-proofing of all buildings, outhouses and other superstructures, stables, lots, open areas and other premises, sidewalks, streets and alleys in the city of New Orleans.

Whereas, during the month of June, 1914, the bubonic plague made its appearance in the city of New Orleans, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. BeckSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  2. Burke v. TricalliSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DiStasioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. City of Baton Rouge v. CooleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  3. Doll v. Flintkote Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  4. State v. EgliIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  5. City of New Orleans v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API