Legal Opinion
Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports
Decided November 5, 1991Published
1Opinion of the Court
The Honorable Cliff Hoofman State Senator P.O. Box 1038 North Little Rock, Arkansas 72115
Dear Senator Hoofman:
This is in response to your request for an opinion on several questions concerning the subdivision of property in the City of Maumelle. Specifically, you state the following facts:
Ordinances within the City of Maumelle require each subdivision to contain a percentage of the subdivision to remain as open space and or green space. In most cases, this property is deeded to the city. Apparently, there has developed some difficulties in the city maintaining some of these isolated open…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stewart v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- City of Fort Smith v. BatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- City of Buffalo v. JoslynWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
- Garland v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Mingledorff v. CrumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.