United States v. Witek
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Ralston Wright was convicted of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise (CCE) under 21 U.S.C.A § 848 (West Supp. 1995). We must decide whether the Government presented sufficient evidence to prove Wright’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.1 We conclude that it did not, and vacate Wright’s CCE conviction.
I. BACKGROUND
In late 1991 and early 1992, Ralston Wright and his girlfriend, Appellant Claudette Hubbard, sold narcotics from their residence in Cocoa, Florida. Wright and Hubbard would obtain powdered cocaine and marijuana in Dallas, Texas, process most of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Garrett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. KozminskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. AlredCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Kerry L. Bass, Also Known as Kerry Lerron BassCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. William W. Stevenson, Willie GreerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. WitekCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.