Legal Opinion

State v. Bruestle

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 15, 2004No. 04-0987Published

1Opinion of the Court

State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Claus Bruestle, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-0987.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Opinion Filed: December 15, 2004.

¶ 1 SNYDER, J.[1]

Claus Bruestle appeals from judgments finding him guilty of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a) and guilty of operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol content (PAC) contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). The issue before this court is whether the arresting officer used reasonable means to convey the implied consent warnings set forth in WIS. STAT . § 343.305(4). We agree…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PiddingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. BegicevicCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  3. State v. BaratkaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API