Legal Opinion

Xavier v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 18, 2011No. C 10-02067 WHAPublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, PARTIALLY GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DENYING CLASS CERTIFICATION

WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

In this putative class action seeking medical monitoring for heavy smokers, defendant Philip Morris USA Inc. moves for judgment on the pleadings as to two claims and also moves for summary judgment on the entire action. At the same time, plaintiffs Burt Xavier and James Franklin move for class certification. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is Denied, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Marcus v. BMW of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  2. Vince Mullins v. Direct Digital, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  3. Crystal Byrd v. Aaron's IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  4. William Hayes v. WalMart Stores IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  5. In re Myford Touch Consumer LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API