Xavier v. Philip Morris USA Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, PARTIALLY GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DENYING CLASS CERTIFICATION
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this putative class action seeking medical monitoring for heavy smokers, defendant Philip Morris USA Inc. moves for judgment on the pleadings as to two claims and also moves for summary judgment on the entire action. At the same time, plaintiffs Burt Xavier and James Franklin move for class certification. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is Denied, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Marcus v. BMW of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Vince Mullins v. Direct Digital, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Crystal Byrd v. Aaron's IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- William Hayes v. WalMart Stores IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- In re Myford Touch Consumer LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.