Legal Opinion

Beckman v. Thompson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 1992No. B057154PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHBY, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Ron Beckman sued defendants and respondents Michael Thompson and Philips Credit Corporation (Philips) for breach of contract and intentional interference with contract. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 410.30, subdivision (a) and 418.10, the trial court granted respondent Philips’s motion to quash service of summons for lack of personal jurisdiction and granted respondent Thompson’s motion to dismiss on the ground of inconvenient forum, in that the matter should more appropriately be tried in Tennessee.

Appellant, a California resident,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Callet v. AliotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Sibley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Stangvik v. Shiley Inc.California Supreme Court · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. Pedro T.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. AcostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. People v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Brenton v. Metabolife International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Goehring v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API