Stuart M. Kaplan, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for Palmer Data Corporation D/B/A Computerminal v. Burroughs Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Stuart M. Kaplan, as the Trustee in Bankruptcy for Palmer Data Corporation, doing business as CompuTerminal, appeals the decision of the court below entering judgment non obstante veredicto (n. o. v.) in favor of defendant Burroughs Corporation on Kaplan’s action alleging a violation of Section One of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. We affirm the judgment, though on different grounds than those advanced below.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Kaplan, as Trustee in Bankruptcy, asserts the claim of Palmer Data Corporation against the defendant…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Aydin Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Loral Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Conic Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Klamath-Lake Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. Klamath Medical Service BureauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- County of Tuolumne v. Sonora Community HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Viamedia, Incorporation v. Comcast CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Tafford E. Oltz v. St. Peter's Community Hospital, Tafford E. Oltz v. St. Peter's Community HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.