Legal Opinion
(PC) Foster v. Clark
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 15, 2023No. 1:22-cv-00976Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MICHAEL FOSTER, Case No. 1:22-cv-00976-SAB (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S THIRD MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF 11 v. COUNSEL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE 12 KEN CLARK, et al., (ECF No. 36) 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Michael Foster is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 16 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s third motion for appointment of counsel, filed 18 May 12, 2023. Plaintiff asks for appointment of counsel because he is unable to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Wayne Acton and Judy Acton, Guardians Ad Litem for James Acton v. Vernonia School District 47jCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994