Legal Opinion
Byrd v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided April 13, 2020No. 8:18-cv-00036Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA NADINE BYRD, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Ronald Byrd, Deceased; 8:18CV36 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER vs. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., Defendant. Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co. (UPRR) moves to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Robert Gale (Dr. Gale) and Dr. Joseph R. Landolph, Jr. (Dr. Landolph). (Filing No. 63). UPRR requests a hearing pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 104(c) to determine the admissibility of the proposed expert testimony of Drs. Gale and Landolph. (Filing No. 63). Plaintiff Nadine Byrd…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.