Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dollar v. City of Ashford

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 3, 1995No. 2940951Published

1Dissent

Prior to the enactment of Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-11.1, an employee at will could be discharged for any reason or for no reason at all. See Meeks v. Opp Cotton Mills, 459 So.2d 814 (Ala. 1984). In 1984, our legislature established a retaliatory discharge cause of action to deter employers from discriminating against workmen's compensation claimants who would have had no remedy, under the common law "employment at will" doctrine, for their wrongful termination. See Twilley v.Daubert Coated Products, Inc., 536 So.2d 1364, 1367 (Ala. 1988).

I do not believe that the legislature intended, however,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Twilley v. Daubert Coated Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Meeks v. OPP Cotton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Delbridge v. CIVIL SERVICE BD. OF CITY OF TUSCALOOSACourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  4. Hall v. City of DothanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  5. Hall v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API