Legal Opinion

Norton v. Hickingbottom

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 22, 1947No. 4-8365PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Griffin Smith, Chief Justice.

J. C. Hickingbottom, a building contractor, sued Dr. E. F. Norton and Mary G. Norton, (husband and wife) alleging that by the terms of a written contract the plaintiff was to supply labor necessary to make certain repairs to real property owned by the defendants, compensation to be $1,389.75. It was further alleged that as the work progressed there were requested alterations or additions, reasonable value of which was $792.75. The undertakings were finished November 15, 1945. Demand was for payment covering the additional.services, with interest at six per cent,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White Black Rivers Bridge Company v. VaughanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. O'Neal v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  3. Consolidated Rendering Co. v. New Haven Hotel Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1924
  4. Reiff v. Interstate Business Men's Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  5. Rogers v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. StupentiSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  3. Swafford v. Sealtest Foods Division of National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. Western Auto Supply Co. v. Sullivan. Sullivan v. Western Auto Supply CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  5. Boone v. General Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API