White Black Rivers Bridge Company v. Vaughan
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). It is first insisted by counsel for the defendant that there is no basis for the allowance of the'$1,000 attorney’s fee, which must have entered into the verdict of the jury. The verdict of the jury was for $2,750 for the plaintiff on his complaint, and it was adjudged that this amount should bear interest at six per cent, from the 8th of June, which was fixed by the court as the date of the termination of the plaintiff’s employment. It is insisted by counsel for the defendant that the only basis of allowance of the $1,000 item was the testimony of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Prager v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Insurance Co. of NewarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Spalding v. MasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Curtis v. InneraritySupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Bayou Meto Drainage District v. ChaplineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Peterson v. Worthen Bank & Trust Co., NASupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Barnes v. BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Henry v. Gaines-Derden Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Hawkins v. Delta Spindle of Blytheville, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Lovelace v. Director, Employment SEC. Dept.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.