Legal Opinion

Shay v. Nixon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1980No. 795SC474PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The question raised by this appeal is whether the court should have granted the defendants’ motion for a directed verdict at the end of all the evidence. The defendants’ motion for directed verdict should have been allowed if the jury could have drawn no *110conclusion from the evidence but that either the collision was not proximately caused by the negligence of defendant Ralph Edward Nixon, or that the contributory negligence of the plaintiff was a proximate cause of the collision.

The evidence that Ralph Edward Nixon suddenly stopped the taxicab in the inside southbound lane of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. McMahanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Ratliff v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Stith v. PerdueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. OdellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Horne v. TrivetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API