Legal Opinion

Touma v. St. Mary's Bank

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 11, 1998No. 96-072PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.

The plaintiffs, Dooley’s II, Inc., a corporation that operated T.J. Dooley’s II restaurant in Manchester, and its sole shareholder, David M. Touma, appeal the decision of the Superior Court (Groff, J.) that they failed to prove that the defendant’s, St. Mary’s Bank, defamatory foreclosure advertisement caused the decline and ultimate failure of the restaurant. The defendant cross-appeals the trial court’s determination that the foreclosure advertisement was defamatory and the denial of its request for past due rent. We reverse in part, vacate in part, affirm in part, and remand.

The trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. In Re Prichard Plaza Associates Ltd. PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
  4. Duchesnaye v. Munro Entersprises, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  5. Nash v. Keene Publishing Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. W.J.A. v. D.A.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  2. MacDonald v. RiggsAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Thomas v. Telegraph Pub. Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  4. Sanguedolce v. WolfeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  5. Case v. St. Mary's BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API