Legal Opinion
Sanguedolce v. Wolfe
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 25, 2013No. 2012-217PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The plaintiff, Paul Sanguedolce, appeals a decision of the Superior Court (McNamara, J.) granting the motion to dismiss of the defendant, Telegraph Publishing Company (Telegraph). Named defendant Andrew Wolfe is not a party to this appeal. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.
I
In September 2011, the plaintiff, an inmate in the state prison, filed a defamation action against the Telegraph, which is a newspaper, and Wolfe, a Telegraph reporter. The writ alleged that, on April 21,2011, the Telegraph published a newspaper article written by Wolfe stating that the plaintiff, an accomplice…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Tessier v. RockefellerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Hyde v. City of ColumbiaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Remsburg v. Docusearch, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- General Insulation Co. v. Eckman ConstructionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Beverly A. Cluff-Landry v. Roman Catholic Bishop of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- State v. Thomas MiltonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- Ortolano v. City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2025
- Administrator of the Estate of Michael D. Veilleux & a. v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2023
- Automated Transactions, LLC & a. v. American Bankers Association & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.