Legal Opinion
(PC) Sanders v. Grimes
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 24, 2020No. 1:18-cv-01285Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TROY ALEXANDER SANDERS, Case No. 1:18-cv-01285-AWI-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED 13 v. COMPLAINT OR NOTIFY THE COURT OF HIS DESIRE TO PROCEED ONLY ON 14 GRIMES, et al., CLAIMS FOUND COGNIZABLE 15 Defendants. (Doc. 35) 16 21-DAY DEADLINE 17 18 On December 6, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it fails to 19 state a cognizable access to courts claim because it fails to show that Plaintiff’s underlying claim 20 (i.e., a direct appeal of a…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.