Golconda Cattle Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
On rehearing.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
Our former decision in this case is reported in 201 Fed. 281, 119 C. C. A. 519. A rehearing was granted, and after its reargument, and a very careful reconsideration of the record, we are convinced that in two respects indicated in the former opinion the court was in error — one as to a matter of fact and the other of law. In regard to the latter, it was said in the opinion — following the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Eighth Circuit in the case of Homer v. United States, 185 Fed. 741, 108 C. C. A. 79 — that the question of intent with which the fencing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Potts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
- Homer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
- Golconda Cattle Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
- Hanley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States ex rel. Bergen v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Iron Bar Holdings v. CapeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
- United States v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988