Legal Opinion

Golconda Cattle Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1914No. 2143PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On rehearing.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

Our former decision in this case is reported in 201 Fed. 281, 119 C. C. A. 519. A rehearing was granted, and after its reargument, and a very careful reconsideration of the record, we are convinced that in two respects indicated in the former opinion the court was in error — one as to a matter of fact and the other of law. In regard to the latter, it was said in the opinion — following the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Eighth Circuit in the case of Homer v. United States, 185 Fed. 741, 108 C. C. A. 79 — that the question of intent with which the fencing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Potts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
  3. Homer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  4. Golconda Cattle Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
  5. Hanley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Bergen v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. Iron Bar Holdings v. CapeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
  3. United States v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API