Legal Opinion

Hanley v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1911No. 1,814PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon. William Hanley was convicted of a criminal offense, and brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error was defendant in the court below to an indictment containing two counts, the first of which charged him with unlawfully maintaining and controlling certain fences, which, together with natural barriers and cross-fences, inclosed a large body of public land of the United States situated in Harney comity, state of Oregon, and the second of which counts charged him with unlawfully preventing and obstructing persons from peaceably entering upon or establishing a settlement or residence on the tracts of public land within the inclosure, and preventing and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Potts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. RindgeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1913
  2. Mackay v. Uinta Development Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  3. Golconda Cattle Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
  4. Golconda Cattle Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API