Legal Opinion

Morris Mandelbaum v. United States of America, and Frank Savage

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 17, 1958No. 23757_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINCKS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered for the defendant United States after trial without a jury in an action, arising out of a vehicular collision, brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(b). The defendant Savage, who was the driver of the defendant’s vehicle, was never served but, as hereinafter appears, testified in the plaintiff’s behalf.

The following facts are undisputed. For approximately three months before the incident giving rise to this suit, Savage was stationed at the Fort Hamilton army base in Brooklyn. He had never been in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  2. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Riley v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. St. Andrassy v. MooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Piwowarski v. CornwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Evans-Reid v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Dworkis v. DworkisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  3. Goodkin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  4. Federal Insurance Company v. Harry SummersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
  5. Pacheco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API