Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sobotka v. Chrysler Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1993No. Docket 139553Published

1DissentMarilyn Kelly, J.

(dissenting.) I respectfully dissent.

I disagree with the majority that Thayer and *466Trask1 control the outcome of this case. Whether these cases still have application in any workers’ compensation case I need not decide. However, they are clearly inapplicable to the facts in the instant case.

In Trask, the injured employee was an auditor and officer manager. She received a salary of $60 per week before her injury. After recovering, she asked to return to her old job. However, due to a change in economic conditions, the job was no longer available. She later found employment with a different…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. Great Lakes Steel Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Trask v. Modern Pattern & Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Consumers Power Co. v. Corporation & Securities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Juneac v. ITT Hancock IndustriesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Thayer v. BritzMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API