Juneac v. ITT Hancock Industries
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendants ITT Hancock Industries and Insurance Company of North America appeal by leave granted from a March 8, 1988, order and opinion of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board. The wcab found that plaintiff was partially disabled and entitled to weekly benefits. It also awarded her supplemental benefits pursuant to MCL 418.352; MSA 17.237(352). On appeal, itt and ina contend that the decision does not comply with accepted standards for wcab rulings and that the board erred in awarding plaintiff supplemental benefits. We affirm the board’s decision finding partial disability and reverse the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hood v. Wyandotte Oil & Fat Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Nunn v. GA CANTRICK CO., INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Frammolino v. Richmond Products Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Flynn v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sobotka v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Corbett v. Montgomery Ward & Co, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Flint v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Petrie v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- Eaton v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.