Legal Opinion

People v. Atencio

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 16, 1977No. 27071PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hodges

Defendant-appellant Atencio was found guilty by a jury of possession of a narcotic drug 1 and conspiracy to sell. 2 On this appeal, the defendant asserts several grounds for reversal. We find no reversible error and therefore affirm.

According to the evidence, Officer Ramirez of the Drug Enforcement Administration Task Force learned from one A1 Maestas that “Joe,” who was located in Colorado Springs, had heroin for sale. Maestas arranged a meeting in Colorado Springs between Ramirez and “Joe,” who was subsequently identified as defendant Atencio.

In Colorado Springs, Maestas entered a house on…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. KingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. People v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  5. Martinez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. MascarenasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. People v. AalbuSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. People v. GomezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. People v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. Alonzi v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API