Legal Opinion
Exxon Corp. v. Crosby-Mississippi Resources, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 30, 1994No. 93-07519PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Per curiam
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Appeal No. 93-7519, involving a dispute between the parties to an operating agreement, and appeal No. 93-7525, involving a dispute between the parties to a gas-purchase contract, were consolidated on appeal because they both involve similar contractual provisions and the question of whether those provisions violate Miss.Code Ann. § 15-1-5.
A. Appeal No. 93-7519
On April 3, 1985, Exxon, as operator, and Crosby Mississippi Resources Limited (CMR), as non-operator, entered into a joint operating agreement for the drilling, completion, and operation of the Oliver…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Richard L. Conkling v. Bert S. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Matter of Haber Oil Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Calpetco 1981, a Limited Partnership v. Marshall Exploration, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Wichita Falls Office Associates v. Banc One Corporation, Banc One Corporation and Bank One, Texas, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Rose Ana Forbes Lemelle, Rose Ana Forbes Lemelle v. Universal Mfg. Corp., Universal Mfg. Corp., Werts Novelty Co., Inc., Usf & GCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Shields Ltd. Partnership v. BradberryTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- Rivera v. Nibco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Neff v. American Dairy Queen Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Armstrong Petroleum Corp. v. Tri-Valley Oil & Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 2004
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.