Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Gilliland

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 20, 1995No. 94-627PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

This case requires us to decide whether the trial court erred in failing to apply certain statutes of limitations relating to the bailment or conversion of personal property. On appeal, three points are argued for reversal: (1) the trial court erred in finding that there was substantial evidence to support a finding that the complaint was filed within the time allowed by the statute of limitations; (2) the trial court erred in finding that there was substantial evidence to support the jury verdict finding that the boat and trailer in question were “capable of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tarrence v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  2. Interstate Freeway Services, Inc. v. HouserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. White River Rural Water District v. MoonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. McNair v. McNairSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Robertson v. CeolaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Advocat, Inc. v. SauerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. American Abstract & Title Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. United Insurance Co. of America v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Ellis v. PriceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Bank of Eureka Springs v. EvansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API