Legal Opinion

Bank of Eureka Springs v. Evans

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 5, 2003No. 02-623PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WH. “Dub” Arnold, Chief Justice.

In this appeal, appellants The Bank of Eureka Springs and John Cross (referred to hereafter as the Bank) seek to reverse the decision of a Carroll County jury holding the Bank liable for the malicious prosecution of appellee Floyd Carroll Evans. Appellants argue that they are entided to a dismissal, either because the circuit court erred in holding that their actions were not protected by the “safe harbor” provision of the Annunzio-Wylie Money Laundering Act, 31 U.S.C. § 5318(g)(3) (Supp. 1999) (Act), or, in the alternative, because the jury’s verdict is not…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Let W. Lee v. Bankers Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. Hodges v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. FooteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Advocat, Inc. v. SauerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. McMickle v. GriffinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. FMC CORPORATION, INC. v. HeltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Byme, Inc. v. IvySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. DodsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  5. Arkansas Tobacco Control Board v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API