Heinsohn v. Motley
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Rulon, J.:
Charles Heinsohn, plaintiff, appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Dellyn H. Motley. We find no reversible error and affirm.
The facts of this case are as follows:
Motley owned a cabin located west of Topeka. Shortly after purchasing the cabin in 1969, Motley installed a wood heating stove with the help of a friend. Later, between 1975 and 1977, Motley purchased a used propane heating stove which was also installed in the cabin by a friend. Motley was present during the installation of the propane stove, but did not pay too much attention to the installation…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McAlister v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Baker v. City of Garden CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- McFeeters v. RenolletSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Farmers State Bank & Trust Co. v. City of Yates CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goodrich v. SeamandsWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- International Ass'n of Firefighters Local 1596 v. City of LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
- Lenhardt Tool & Die Co., Inc. v. LumpeIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Hewitt v. Kirk's Remodeling & Custom Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2013