Legal Opinion

Knoud v. Galante

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 3, 1997No. 01695PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

This is an appeal by permission, pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. 702(b), from the Order of the *855Delaware County Court of Common Pleas denying the motion of Appellant, Delaware County Transportation Service, Inc., for summary judgment. In its certified issue for review, the trial court asks this Court to determine “[w]hether, under the specific facts of this case, a common carrier has a continuing duty to intoxicated passengers who have alighted from the bus and are subsequently killed in a motor vehicle accident.” (Trial Ct. Order 2/27/96). For the reasons set forth below, we conclude…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Congini by Congini v. PORTERSVILLE ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Wenrick v. Schloemann-Siemag AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Klein v. RaysingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Gamble Farm Inn, Inc. v. Selective InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Tyler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rush v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Moses v. T.N.T. Red Star ExpressSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Mastriano v. BlyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  4. Commerce Insurance v. Ultimate Livery Service, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  5. T.H.E. Insurance Company v. Melyndia DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API