Legal Opinion

Treat v. Liddell

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1858PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of the County of San Francisco This was an action of unlawful detainer, to recover possession of leased premises, and for damages for their detention. The premises were leased by the plaintiffs to the defendant John H. Liddell, at $40 per month—$20 payable to plaintiff Treat, and $20 payable to Edward Carpenter, since deceased. The action was originally commenced in a Justice’s Court, where defendants had judgment.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the County Court of the County of San Francisco This was an action of unlawful detainer, to recover possession of leased premises, and for damages for their detention. The premises were leased by the plaintiffs to the defendant John H. Liddell, at $40 per month—$20 payable to plaintiff Treat, and $20 payable to Edward Carpenter, since deceased. The action was originally commenced in a Justice’s Court, where defendants had judgment. Plaintiffs appealed to the County Court, where the cause was tried by the intervention of a jury, who returned a verdict for the plaintiff, and $40 per…

1Opinion of the CourtTerry, C. J.

Baldwin, J., and Field, J., concurring.

*303There is no misjoinder of parties plaintiff; the action does not arise upon contract, but in tort. By failing to pay rent when demanded, the contract under the lease was determined, and the possession of the defendants was, from that time, tortious.

The question of title to the property does not arise ; the lease is evidence, not of title in the plaintiff, but of the fact of actual possession prior to defendants’ entry, and of the fact that defendants acquired possession under them.

The verdict and evidence are conclusive that the judgment recovered by Hoe…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bates v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Ralph v. LomerWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. People v. Lum YitCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Newton v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Reno Mill & Lumber Co. v. WesterfieldNevada Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API