Legal Opinion
Keith v. Heckler
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided January 25, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-9-NNPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DOUMAR, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Mary B. Keith, by counsel, brought this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g) seeking review of the Secretary’s final decision denying her supplemental social security benefits. The matter is before the Court on the Secretary’s motion to dismiss the action, and the opposition motion of the plaintiff. The Court DISMISSES the action for the reasons below.
I
42 U.S.C. § 405(g) not only grants but delineates the requisites for federal district court jurisdiction over this subject matter. The section requires commencing a civil action for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Parissi v. Telechron, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- John Easley v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- Roby L. Teague v. Joseph A. Califano, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Eugene Whipp v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Theola A. Jarrett v. Us Sprint Communications CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Marcus D. Robinson v. America's Best Contacts and EyeglassesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Wanamaker v. Columbian Rope Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1989
- Burnett v. Perry Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Former Employees of Badger Coal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.