Legal Opinion
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Ala. v. Beck
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided February 10, 1988No. Civ. 5947PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This appeal involves a written settlement agreement which was found to be ambiguous because one party "believed" and "intended" for the agreement to cover certain special nursing charges. The trial court then ordered Blue Cross and Blue Shield (Blue Cross) to pay James and Lois Beck (the Becks) $9,888.56, representing special nursing charges incurred by the Becks' daughter (Laura) while confined in the hospital. Blue Cross appeals.
This suit was brought by the Becks for damages and for injunctive relief requiring Blue Cross and the Employee's Health Benefit Plan for Employees of AmSouth Bank…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chambers v. RingstaffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Mass Appraisal Services, Inc. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Camp v. MilamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Federated Guar. Life Ins. Co. v. DunnCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
3Cited by8 opinions
- General Aviation, Inc. v. Aerial Services, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Ex Parte LittlepageSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Files v. Variety Wholesalers, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
- Conner v. Auburn Partners, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- Harris v. HarrisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.