Legal Opinion

Klugman v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 19, 1931No. 28,472PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Certiorari to the industrial commission to review an order denying workman’s compénsation.

The injury, if it occurred as relator claims, was serious. It resulted in the loss of vision of the right eye, that of the left having gone some time before, so that relator is now totally blind.

We have examined the record with care, but without finding-ground upon which to disturb the order under review. It is a question whether the evidence compels a finding that there was any injury. There is the other question of causation. The burden of proof was on relator. Much medical testimony, with no inherent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. Excelsior Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brameld v. Albert Dickinson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Cooper v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Johnson v. Nash-Finch Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Farley v. Nelson, Mullen & Nelson, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API