Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Farley v. Nelson, Mullen & Nelson, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 16, 1931No. Nos. 28,552, 28,562PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Certiorari to review the order of the industrial commission awarding plaintiff compensation under the workmen’s compensation act against Farrell & Clark and the Koyal Indemnity Company.

On March 14, 1980, Farley Avas employed by Farrell & Clark in driving a caterpillar tractor. On that day, while hammering on some of the tractor steel gears, he suffered an accident to his right eye. The day after the accident he consulted Dr. Fulton, avIio removed from the surface of the eye a small piece of foreign matter which looked like a small piece of steel. Farley visited Dr. Fulton again on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. Excelsior Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Klugman v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Nash-Finch Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Zitzman v. MacHtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Merchants Trust Co. v. G. Sommers & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API